Wybo Wiersma – a 40-year-old Oxford University graduate – has been sentenced to four and a half years in prison after scamming over $2 million in crypto from unsuspecting victims. Following his arrest in 2019, the Dutchman was extradited from the Netherlands back to the United Kingdom (UK) in 2021. Following a five-year investigation by the South East Regional Organised Crime Unit (SEROCU), he pled guilty on January 26 to the Oxford Crown Court. A Five-Year Investigation As reported by…
What are Blockchain Network Attacks?
Blockchain attacks refer to various methods used to disrupt the normal functioning of a blockchain network. These can include:
- Double-spending: occurs when a malicious user can spend the same digital currency or token more than once.
- 51% attack: In this attack, a group of malicious actors controls more than 50% of the computing power on a blockchain network, allowing them to control the network’s consensus mechanism and potentially reverse or alter past transactions.
- Sybil attack: Here, a malicious user creates multiple fake identities to gain control of a significant portion of the network’s resources or influence its consensus mechanism.
- Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack: This attack involves overwhelming a blockchain network with a large amount of traffic, making it difficult or impossible for legitimate users to access the network.
- Smart Contract Attack: These attacks take advantage of vulnerabilities in the code of smart contracts that run on the blockchain to execute malicious actions on the contracts.
- Phishing: This attack involves tricking users into giving away their private keys or seed phrases to a malicious actor, who can then steal their funds.
- Race condition attack: This attack takes advantage of a race condition vulnerability in a smart contract to execute multiple transactions at once, allowing the attacker to acquire more assets than they should be able to.
- Replay attack: In this attack, a malicious user takes a valid transaction that has already been broadcasted to the network and “replays” it, causing it to be processed again and potentially allowing the attacker to double-spend their assets.
- Eclipse attack: This attack involves isolating a specific node on the network, also known as a “victim node,” from the rest of the network, allowing the attacker to control the information the node receives and potentially manipulate the node’s behavior.
- Selfish mining: A malicious miner creates a secret blockchain fork and only releases it to the public when they have mined enough blocks to have a lead over the public chain, allowing them to control more than their fair share of the network’s resources.
- Routing attacks: These attacks target the communication networks that blockchain nodes use to connect, isolate certain nodes, or disrupt the flow of information on the network.
- Cartel formation: A group of miners or validators collude to perform actions not in the interest of the network or the community, such as censoring transactions or increasing their revenue at the expense of network security.
- Value overflow attack: This attack takes advantage of a vulnerability in a smart contract that allows an attacker to overflow a variable, creating an arbitrarily large value that can be used to steal assets or disrupt the normal functioning of the contract.
- Ghost attack: A malicious miner sends empty blocks to a network, which can slow down the mining process, increase the number of orphaned blocks, and cause delays in confirming transactions.
- Check-Sequence-Verify (CSV) malleability attack: This attack takes advantage of a vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol that allows an attacker to modify the transaction ID, making it difficult to track the movement of funds and potentially causing double-spending.
- BGP Hijacking: A malicious actor can take control of a BGP router and announce a false IP prefix for a blockchain network, redirecting traffic to a rogue node and potentially intercepting or altering transactions.
- Private key leakage: This attack occurs when a private key is compromised, allowing the attacker to access and control the associated funds or assets.
- Race-to-empty attack: This type of attack involves a malicious miner repeatedly broadcasting transactions with very high fees, making it difficult for other miners to include transactions with lower fees in the blockchain, potentially causing a backlog of unconfirmed transactions.
- Timestamp manipulation: A malicious miner can manipulate the timestamp of mined blocks, allowing them to solve puzzles faster and potentially control the blockchain’s consensus mechanism.
- Coinjoin attack: This type occurs when a malicious user joins a Coinjoin transaction, a privacy-enhancing technique, to trace the flow of funds in the transaction, potentially de-anonymizing the participants.
- Self-mining attack: This type of attack occurs when a miner creates multiple identities and uses them to mine blocks on the blockchain, thus increasing their chances of getting the block reward and controlling more resources than they should.
- Rollback attack: occurs when a miner or a group of miners with a significant amount of hash power revert to a previous block, allowing them to double-spend their coins or revert valid transactions.
- Fake Stake attack: This attack occurs when an attacker uses a small amount of real stake to control a large amount of fake stake, allowing them to manipulate the consensus mechanism of the blockchain and disrupt the network.
- Weathervane attack: occurs when an attacker moves their hash power between chains to disrupt the network by making a chain unmineable or more profitable to mine on a different chain.
- Long-Range attack: occurs when an attacker creates a private copy of the blockchain and mines it on it, potentially creating a longer chain than the current one. When they decide to reveal their chain, they can cause a fork in the network, disrupting the consensus mechanism and possibly double-spend their coins.
- Blockchain-based ransom attack: occurs when an attacker encrypts the data on a blockchain network and demands a ransom for the decryption key, threatening to delete the data if the ransom is not paid.
- Man-in-the-middle attack: occurs when an attacker intercepts and alters the communication between two parties, potentially allowing them to steal funds or disrupt transactions.
- Blockchain-based phishing attack: occurs when an attacker tricks a user into giving away their private key or seed phrase, allowing them to steal their funds.
- Nothing at Stake attack: This type of attack occurs when a miner or a group of miners can mine on multiple chains simultaneously with no cost, potentially causing a fork in the network and disrupting the consensus mechanism.
- Pre-mine attack: This type of attack occurs when a miner or group of miners mines a significant number of coins before the official launch of a blockchain network, allowing them to control a large percentage of the total supply and potentially disrupt the network.
- Blockchain-based censorship attack: occurs when a miner or group of miners can prevent certain transactions from being added to the blockchain, potentially censoring certain types of transactions or users.
- Forced Execution Attack: This attack occurs when an attacker forces a smart contract function to execute, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to data or unintended execution of code.
- Front-running attack: This type of attack occurs when an attacker takes advantage of their privileged access to network information to execute a transaction before others, potentially profiting from the information they gained.
- Blockchain-based Ponzi scheme: This attack occurs when an attacker creates a fake investment opportunity, using new investments to pay off earlier investors and eventually running away with the funds.
- Blockchain-based pump and dump: This type of attack occurs when an attacker artificially inflates the price of a cryptocurrency by buying it in large quantities and then selling it at a higher price, potentially causing losses for other investors.
- Blockchain-based insider trading: This attack occurs when an attacker uses privileged information to buy or sell a cryptocurrency at a favorable price, potentially causing losses for other investors.
- Blockchain-based money laundering: This attack occurs when an attacker uses cryptocurrency to transfer money obtained through illegal activities, potentially hiding the origin of the funds and making them difficult to trace.
- Blockchain-based malware: This attack occurs when an attacker creates malware that can steal personal information, private keys, or cryptocurrency from the affected device.
- Blockchain-based extortion: This attack occurs when an attacker threatens to disrupt a blockchain network or steal funds unless a ransom is paid.
- Blockchain-based data manipulation: This attack occurs when an attacker alters data stored on the blockchain, potentially altering the network’s history or the data’s integrity.
- Blockchain-based rogue node attack: occurs when an attacker creates a rogue node that can disrupt the network by broadcasting false information or disrupting the consensus mechanism.
- Blockchain-based voting manipulation: This attack occurs when an attacker manipulates the voting process on a blockchain network, potentially altering the outcome of the vote.
- The blockchain-based key-recovery attack: occurs when an attacker steals a user’s private key or seed phrase, potentially allowing them to steal the user’s funds or disrupt their transactions.
- Blockchain-based smart contract exploits: This attack occurs when an attacker finds and exploits a vulnerability in a smart contract, potentially allowing them to steal funds or disrupt the contract’s operation.
Conclusion
These attacks can vary in complexity, and each attack’s impact and likelihood can depend on the specific blockchain network and the security measures implemented to protect it. Additionally, new types of attacks are continually being developed, and developers and researchers need to stay vigilant and improve the security of blockchain systems.