The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector is rapidly growing but still faces significant challenges. For example, one of the biggest issues DeFi must address is Impermanent Loss (IL). This is a problem that can have serious consequences for liquidity providers. Today's review will examine how SMARDEX intends to solve the IL problem and end liquidity providers' unjust losses. We'll also look at all the services that SMARDEX offers and examine the project's tokenomics. What Is SMARDEX? SMARDEX is a project intending…
Layer 2 Blockchain Projects – A Guide for Beginners
One of the critical difficulties confronting the blockchain community is the matter of scalability. While the technology has proven its high potential over the years, several aspects limit its applicability to a large scale.
Since humankind developed the first technological inventions, the scalability problem has been on our minds. We’ll expand on that in this post, looking at the case of Layer 2 blockchains.
Layer 2 (L2) blockchain definition
The “Layer 2 blockchain technology” concept is gaining traction on the market. We often refer to Layer 2 solutions as “off-chain” blockchain technology. Their primary purpose is to enhance the capacity of blockchain transactions while keeping the distributed protocol’s decentralized benefits.
Solving the scalability problem will go a long way toward ensuring blockchain’s general acceptance.
The architecture must balance security, decentralization, and scalability to build a good blockchain ecosystem. For instance, Layer 2 blockchain technology systems can work with blockchains like Ethereum.
In this case, our L2 solution would obviously leverage Ethereum’s security and structure.
We are adding smart contracts to the main blockchain protocol that interact with off-chain events. If you know this technology, you will understand how easy this is, compared to editing the Ethereum protocol structure.
Layer 2 (L2) platforms and protocols manage data so that the base layer does not carry an excessive burden. In this way, the blockchain network can accommodate substantially higher transaction throughput.
Do we need L2 solutions?
Scaling blockchains is becoming more crucial as the technology becomes more widely used globally. In addition, the current research will make faster blockchain processing capacity available shortly.
Theoretically, a blockchain should be capable of handling any number of transactions per second (TPS). However, experience proves that this isn’t the case, as traditional and new blockchains suffer from data congestion.
L2 scaling solutions can help solve problems like these by enabling efficient mechanisms. The secret to scalability is improving the system’s efficiency without raising block sizes or overcomplicating the network.
The trade-off between decentralization and efficiency is a famous issue among crypto pundits. Finding the right balance between the two forces appears challenging, but the last improvements give hope to the market.
For example, the Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains cannot process hundreds of TPS. Even worse, as volume grows, so do costs.
The problem of L1 solutions
Systems such as Bitcoin and Ethereum need to face their scalability limits daily. Consider that Paypal and Visa currently manage thousands of transactions per second. Therefore, the market can hardly accept that Ethereum processes roughly 15–20 transactions per second.
The decentralized network must obtain a global consensus when a transaction happens. All nodes in the network keep a full copy of the trades to validate them. This structure makes blockchains highly decentralized systems with pros and cons.
The ultimate objective of L1 blockchains is to re-decentralize the infrastructure, protocols, and applications on the internet.
There are several degrees of solutions available. Without the requirement for a central authority, Layer 1 roots data transfers in an immutable, cryptographically safe way.
By executing off-chain calculations, Layer 2 allows you to minimize data processing on the blockchain dramatically. For example, in a disagreement on the network, the base chain will remain the final judge.
The L2 key benefit is that it minimizes the quantity of data saved on the base L1 system. The mechanism frees up processing resources for other tasks while maintaining security and decentralization benefits.
Popular L2 examples
Developers developed a broad set of solutions to build L2 structures efficiently and elegantly. Among these, we can mention at least two of them:
State payment channels
The Bitcoin Lightning Network is a famous example of a blockchain state payment channel. Raiden, Celer Network, and Connext are all examples of state channels in Ethereum.
Channels in Ethereum work best under two conditions:
- First, the counterparties should know and trust each other.
- The volume of transactions should be significant.
Channels represent the oldest solution developers proposed to fix the scalability issue in the blockchain industry.
Plasma
Plasma is Ethereum’s native “sidechain,” which leverages smart contracts and Merkle trees to generate infinite child chains. The child chains are nearly identical to Ethereum but have their consensus process and business logic.
Plasma stores transaction data and processing in the child chain, then periodically sends state data to Ethereum.
When plasma blockchain members want a withdrawal, they must wait for a “challenge period” (one or two weeks). After that, the mechanism allows other users on the child chain to submit proof to oppose the withdrawal.
After the challenge time, the owner will get the funds if the transaction is legal. However, if the system highlights the withdrawal as fraudulent, the algorithm will trigger a fund reversal process.
OMG Network and Loom Network are examples of this type of technology.
Final thoughts
L2 technology is on the right track, with up to 1,000 times scaling factors. Welcoming new users will be effective due to decreased transaction costs and speed.
Layer 2 solutions will contribute to a thriving and healthy blockchain ecosystem in the future, supporting higher adoption of the technology.
In general, features such as lower costs, faster transactions, and greater chain usability represent the future of this technology. By following this path, the industry can only reach its ultimate widespread adoption purpose.